CK blogged this morning about what he calls "more evidence of Chinese brutality." Sneak preview -- remember the awesome Confucian writing boxes operated manually during the opening ceremonies? Two words: adult diapers.
Well, while he's reading ESPN, I'm reading about brutality of a different sort but no less violent over at Jezebel.
The women at medal ceremonies were chosen for their looks and poise. I knew that already.
(Pic swiped from here.)
What I didn't know was the exacting nature of the screening process -- their eyes had to be 3/10ths as long as their faces, for example.
Then the equally long training: squeezing sheets of paper between their thighs, six hours standing in heels (personally, six minutes is torture enough), and smiling with only eight teeth showing (done by holding chopsticks between the canine teeth).
I'm with CK in wondering whose bright idea it was to implement these standards and these training conditions. Adult diapers are more than enough to make my jaw drop. The coverups about stories like the paralyzed dancer I blogged about earlier and the lengths the Chinese organizing committee went to pull these stunts has me agog.
What the heck is going on?
But c'mon. You're reading a blog written by an American citizen, a proud resident of a country whose government has nonetheless committed atrocious mistakes of its own many times over.
If that argument's a bit overarching for you, here's a bit of narrow superficiality for you: you're reading the writing of a woman who, one day, plans to have a stranger slice off her nipples via cauterization and probe around her mammaries in pursuit of a slightly improved figure.
Wearing an adult diaper versus having body parts burned off? Hm. Which one is more extreme?
So when CK quotes a Chinese performer like this:
“All the tears, the sweat, and sometimes even blood that we shed, I now
think it was quite worth it... When we performed that night, all that I could feel in my
heart was joy. Pure joy.”
It reminds me to pull up the reins a bit. I'm quick to judge the Chinese committee via the stories the media is happy to wave in front of our snobbish Western noses (and besides, doesn't it seem as if every story is framed to make the poor Chinese seem like they really, really, really want to impress more than anything else?!).
But what I forget is that there are individual experiences going into this giant collaborative effort. Instead of reading about the horrors of the Beijing Olympics, I think I'd like, for once, to read it from the horse's mouth.
That is, if I could just find the horse's mouth. Help?
(brownie points for the first to get the allusion in this post's title)