Readings? Yeah, readings. As in
the THING to DO around here where people get up in front of the mic, stare down
at their papers and "perform" their writing. Everyone else sits
back in the shadows and listens in rapture and lavishes everyone else with
literary praise or criticism.
It’s constructive, connecting, networking,
trying out your work on other writers, a vital part of the process.
I avoid it as much as I can.
I could dust off my voice like the deaf
student who came through the program before me. Every time I consider doing that, though, it feels like a
violation. It feels like capitulating to the pressures that have marginalized
me since I arrived, letting the status quo dominate me.
I can attend readings. I have attended readings -- I get print copies and just
follow along with my hearing aid. Which is okay, but redundant as I read
the text.
The big events, the big draws, this week are
the visiting writers. We’ve got some cool people coming: Shelley Jackson, Christian Peet, Erik Davis. And what do they
do when they get here? Yep. Readings.
Graduating students do a special reading
during their last week here. Makes me very glad I haven't gotten to that
stage yet. I get into such a schizophrenic political snit anytime I
forget I forbade myself to think about it the first week I came.
I have this fantasy about doing my graduate
reading differently:
I convert my thesis into video, presenting in
visual situ. Their readings
drone across sound waves; mine will sear into their corneas. I'll recruit signing actors,
superimpose text, emblazon images on a wall.
I'll show them what they've been missing, stuck behind their podiums and chained
to the mic, enslaved by the public address system in the theater.
They'll fall to their knees, their minds
blown. And they'll forget about their strictly larynx-and-eardrum
readings.
Then I remember I am just one student out of
many. A freak fighting the machine. And the only battle plan (desperate tactics for a war I didn't choose) I can think
of is to present myself not as a writer, but as an ersatz filmmaker.
Sigh.
I'm not seeing the difference between a visual medium and an aural one. Are they writers or ersatz radio jockeys?
Posted by: Jon | January 06, 2010 at 02:32 PM
Ha. Kinda my irritation with the whole "reading" phenomenon right there. There isn't much of a difference, really.
But thanks: Next time I get all angsty, I'll just think the phrase "ersatz radio jockey" in my head.
Posted by: QueenAlpo | January 06, 2010 at 02:38 PM